250-bed hospital
$11,200 / yr saved and 28 t CO2 avoided through equipment refresh planning, scheduled PM windows, and lower standby power across connected medical equipment.
240 devices | $48K / yr energy and downtime exposure | 220 t CO2 / yr planning estimate
240 devices | $39K / yr operating estimate | 198 t CO2 / yr planning estimate
Getinge frames sustainability as an installed-base operating question. The calculator layout helps facilities teams compare energy use, avoided downtime, consumable substitution, reprocessing decisions, and disposal routing before a replacement program is approved. Values are planning examples; final figures should be validated against the hospital's tariff, device mix, utilization pattern, and service contract.
These cards show how sustainability analysis changes by care environment. A large hospital may focus on utility cost and PM burden, an ASC may emphasize room turnover and uptime, while long-term care may evaluate replacement cadence, caregiver training, and consumable logistics.
$11,200 / yr saved and 28 t CO2 avoided through equipment refresh planning, scheduled PM windows, and lower standby power across connected medical equipment.
$3,800 / yr saved and 9 t CO2 avoided by pairing efficient devices with documented reprocessing workflows, loaner coverage, and faster service escalation.
$5,600 / yr saved and 14 t CO2 avoided when monitoring, infection control, and consumable replenishment are planned as one lifecycle program.
Share fleet age, device count, utilization pattern, and service contract tier. Getinge will structure the sustainability review around operating cost, training burden, reprocessing assumptions, and documented replacement priorities.